Regulation Name: General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Bill, 2026
Date Of Issue: 17 Apr 2026
Region: South Africa
Agency: SA Parliament
South Africa’s General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Bill, 2026: What AML Compliance Leaders Need to Know
South Africa has introduced the General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Bill, 2026, representing the country’s next major step in strengthening its anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorist financing (CTF), and counter-proliferation financing (CPF) framework. The Bill proposes extensive amendments to the:
- Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA)
- Companies Act
- Nonprofit Organisations Act
- Financial Sector Regulation Act
- Close Corporations Act
The legislation is primarily designed to address deficiencies identified during South Africa’s FATF grey-listing process and prepare the country for its next FATF Mutual Evaluation scheduled for 2027.
For banks, insurers, fintechs, crypto businesses, DNFBPs, corporate service providers, legal professionals, and compliance teams, the Bill introduces several significant obligations that will require immediate planning and implementation.
Why South Africa Introduced the Amendment Bill
The memorandum accompanying the Bill explicitly states that the reforms are intended to address outstanding weaknesses identified during FATF’s enhanced follow-up process and South Africa’s grey-list remediation programme. The objective is to strengthen the country’s AML/CFT effectiveness before the anticipated FATF Mutual Evaluation in October 2027.
The amendments focus on:
- Beneficial ownership transparency
- Enhanced supervisory powers
- Improved sanctions implementation
- Greater information sharing
- Stronger oversight of NPOs
- Technology risk management
- Expanded investigative capabilities
- More effective enforcement mechanisms
Key AML and Compliance Changes in the Bill
- Record Retention Requirement Extended from 5 Years to 7 Years
One of the most impactful changes for accountable institutions is the extension of mandatory record retention periods.
The Bill increases record-keeping requirements from:
- 5 years → 7 years for customer records
- Business relationship documentation
- Transaction records
- Suspicious transaction-related records
The extended retention applies from the termination of a business relationship, completion of a transaction, or submission of a report to the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC).
Compliance Impact
Organizations must:
- Review document retention policies
- Expand storage capacity
- Update data governance frameworks
- Reassess cloud archiving requirements
- Ensure retrieval capabilities for investigations spanning longer periods
- FIC Granted New Powers to Conduct Lifestyle Audits
Perhaps the most notable enhancement is the introduction of lifestyle audits into South Africa’s AML framework.
The Bill defines a lifestyle audit as an examination of whether an individual’s lifestyle is consistent with legitimate income sources. The FIC will now be empowered to:
- Conduct lifestyle audits directly
- Support lifestyle audits conducted by government bodies
- Produce forensic evidence linking individuals, assets, and transactions
- Share audit findings with authorized authorities
Why This Matters
This significantly expands South Africa’s financial crime detection capabilities.
AML teams should anticipate:
- More requests for supporting documentation
- Increased scrutiny of politically exposed persons (PEPs)
- Enhanced investigations involving unexplained wealth
- Greater cooperation between AML regulators and law enforcement
- Expanded Information-Sharing Powers
The FIC’s information-sharing authority is significantly broadened.
The Centre may now share intelligence with:
- Public Procurement Office
- Border Management Authority
- Public Protector
- Special Investigating Unit
- Auditor-General
- Investigative divisions of government departments
- Other competent authorities
Compliance Impact
Financial institutions should expect:
- More regulatory requests
- Faster inter-agency investigations
- Increased use of AML intelligence in procurement fraud and corruption investigations
- Greater visibility of customer risk profiles across government agencies
- New Beneficial Ownership Discrepancy Reporting Requirements
The Companies Act amendments introduce a significant new obligation.
Obliged entities must report any material discrepancy between:
- Beneficial ownership information obtained through AML processes, and
- Information recorded in South Africa’s beneficial ownership register.
A discrepancy is considered material when it prevents reliable identification or verification of beneficial owners.
Compliance Impact
This effectively turns financial institutions into active participants in maintaining the integrity of South Africa’s beneficial ownership registry.
Organizations should:
- Review beneficial ownership verification procedures
- Introduce discrepancy escalation workflows
- Build reporting mechanisms to the Companies Commission
- Enhance beneficial ownership quality controls
- Tougher Beneficial Ownership Enforcement
The Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) receives stronger enforcement powers.
A company may face deregistration if it fails to submit:
- Securities registers, or
- Beneficial ownership registers
for two consecutive years.
Additionally:
- Administrative fines can now be imposed directly by the Commission.
- Maximum fines increase dramatically.
- Penalties may reach the greater of:
- 10% of company turnover, or
- Prescribed limits of at least R10 million.
Compliance Impact
Corporate governance and company secretarial functions must now be tightly integrated with AML compliance programmes.
- Stronger Oversight of Non-Profit Organisations (NPOs)
The Bill expands regulatory supervision over NPOs.
New powers include:
- Compliance monitoring
- Enforcement actions
- Administrative sanctions
- Appeals mechanisms
- Enhanced penalties
Maximum penalties increase to:
- R1 million fines
- Five years imprisonment
- Or both
Why This Matters
FATF has repeatedly highlighted NPO vulnerabilities globally due to terrorism financing risks.
NPOs operating in South Africa should review:
- Governance frameworks
- Beneficial ownership records
- Financial controls
- AML policies
- Reporting obligations
- Enhanced Terrorist Financing and Sanctions Controls
The Bill strengthens South Africa’s implementation of targeted financial sanctions.
Accountable institutions will be required to:
- Screen clients against newly notified entities
- Report frozen property
- Report attempted transactions involving sanctioned entities
- Provide ongoing updates regarding controlled assets
The amendments also align sanctions obligations with High Court orders related to terrorism financing matters.
Compliance Impact
Financial institutions should:
- Review sanctions screening systems
- Ensure near-real-time screening capabilities
- Enhance alert investigation processes
- Strengthen sanctions reporting controls
- Mandatory AML Risk Assessment for New Technologies
The Bill introduces explicit requirements regarding emerging technologies.
Before launching new products or services, accountable institutions must assess risks associated with:
- New delivery channels
- Digital onboarding solutions
- AI-driven services
- Emerging financial technologies
- Developing technologies generally
Institutions must identify, assess, mitigate, and manage associated ML/TF/PF risks before deployment.
Why This Matters
This aligns South Africa with FATF’s expectations regarding:
- FinTech innovation
- Virtual assets
- AI-enabled financial services
- Digital transformation initiatives
- Greater Sharing of Information Between Financial Institutions
The amendments explicitly allow accountable institutions to share information when doing so facilitates compliance with AML obligations.
Benefits
This could improve:
- Financial crime detection
- Network analysis
- Mule account identification
- Fraud investigations
- Complex money laundering investigations
However, institutions must maintain appropriate privacy safeguards under South Africa’s data protection framework.
- Expanded Regulatory Access to Beneficial Owners
Financial sector regulators gain authority to obtain information directly from:
- Significant owners
- Beneficial owners
and may initiate investigations where breaches are suspected.
This further reinforces South Africa’s beneficial ownership transparency agenda.
What AML Compliance Leaders Should Do Now
Immediate Actions (0–3 Months)
Conduct a Regulatory Gap Assessment
Review current frameworks against:
- Record retention requirements
- Beneficial ownership controls
- Sanctions reporting obligations
- Technology risk governance
Review BO Verification Processes
Implement procedures to:
- Detect discrepancies
- Escalate findings
- Report material inconsistencies
Update Risk Assessments
Incorporate:
- Emerging technology risks
- AI risks
- Digital onboarding risks
- New delivery mechanisms
Medium-Term Actions (3–9 Months)
Upgrade AML Systems
Assess whether existing systems can support:
- 7-year record retention
- Enhanced sanctions monitoring
- Beneficial ownership discrepancy reporting
- Expanded data sharing obligations
Strengthen Governance
Update:
- AML policies
- Compliance manuals
- Customer due diligence procedures
- Sanctions procedures
- Beneficial ownership frameworks
Train Compliance Teams
Focus training on:
- New FICA obligations
- Sanctions changes
- Beneficial ownership reporting
- Regulatory investigations
- Technology risk controls
Strategic Actions (9–18 Months)
Build FATF-Ready Compliance Programs
The direction of the Bill indicates regulators will increasingly focus on:
- Effectiveness rather than technical compliance
- Beneficial ownership transparency
- Risk-based supervision
- Technology governance
- Financial crime intelligence sharing
Institutions should therefore move beyond checkbox compliance and demonstrate measurable AML effectiveness.
What the Bill Signals About South Africa’s AML Future
The 2026 Amendment Bill marks a clear shift toward a more intelligence-led, data-driven AML regime.
Three themes dominate the reforms:
- Beneficial Ownership Transparency
South Africa is creating stronger mechanisms to ensure beneficial ownership information is accurate, verified, and actionable.
- Enhanced Enforcement
Regulators receive broader powers to investigate, sanction, deregister, and share information.
- Technology and Innovation Oversight
Financial institutions will be expected to assess risks arising from AI, fintech innovations, digital channels, and emerging technologies before deployment.
Conclusion
The General Laws (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing) Amendment Bill, 2026 represents South Africa’s most significant AML reform package since its FATF grey-listing response efforts began. By expanding beneficial ownership transparency, introducing lifestyle audits, strengthening sanctions controls, enhancing NPO oversight, and imposing stricter compliance obligations, the Bill significantly raises regulatory expectations for accountable institutions. AML compliance leaders should begin preparing now by updating governance frameworks, strengthening beneficial ownership controls, enhancing sanctions monitoring, and ensuring technology-driven risk assessments are embedded into their AML programmes. These reforms will likely define South Africa’s AML compliance landscape ahead of its critical FATF Mutual Evaluation in 2027.
Read about the laws; click here.
Read about the product: Transact Comply
Empower your organization with ZIGRAM’s integrated RegTech solutions – Book a Demo
- #AMLCompliance
- #AntiMoneyLaundering
- #AML
- #CFT
- #FinancialCrime
- #FinancialCrimeCompliance
- #SouthAfrica
- #BeneficialOwnership
- #SouthAfricaAML
- #FICA
