Canada Bill C-29: Financial Crimes Agency Act and the Future of AML Enforcement

 

Regulation Name: Bill C-29, officially titled the Financial Crimes Agency ActDate Of Issue: 27 Apr 2026
Region: Canada
Agency: Canada Parliament

Canada’s Bill C-29: What the New Financial Crimes Agency Means for AML Compliance in 2026

Canada has introduced a major legislative reform that could significantly reshape the country’s anti-money laundering (AML), financial crime investigation, and proceeds-of-crime recovery framework. Bill C-29, officially titled the Financial Crimes Agency Act, proposes the creation of a dedicated federal Financial Crimes Agency (FCA) focused exclusively on investigating serious and complex financial crimes.

For AML compliance leaders, banks, fintechs, payment firms, crypto businesses, insurers, securities dealers, and reporting entities operating in Canada, this bill signals a strategic shift toward stronger enforcement, centralized investigations, and enhanced coordination against financial crime.

The legislation also expands Canada’s focus on digital assets, transnational financial crime, proceeds-of-crime recovery, and inter-agency cooperation — areas that are becoming increasingly critical in global AML compliance.

What Is Bill C-29?

Bill C-29 is a proposed Canadian federal law introduced in the House of Commons on April 27, 2026, to establish the Financial Crimes Agency as a specialized law enforcement body dedicated to combating financial crimes and recovering criminal proceeds.

The bill states that the new agency’s objective is to:

• Investigate serious and complex financial crimes
• Contribute to the recovery of proceeds of crime
• Participate in international efforts against financial crime

This marks one of the most important structural AML reforms in Canada in recent years.

Why Canada Is Creating a Financial Crimes Agency

Canada has faced increasing scrutiny over the effectiveness of its financial crime enforcement ecosystem. While FINTRAC operates as Canada’s financial intelligence unit (FIU), enforcement responsibilities have historically been fragmented across multiple agencies, including:

• Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)
• Provincial law enforcement agencies
• Canada Border Services Agency
• FINTRAC
• Public Prosecution Service of Canada

Bill C-29 aims to create a centralized federal agency with specialized expertise to investigate large-scale and sophisticated financial crimes.

The legislation explicitly recognizes the growing threat posed by:

• Money laundering
• Proceeds-of-crime networks
• Cross-border financial crime
• Financial market abuse
• Digital asset-related crimes
• Threats to Canada’s financial system integrity

Financial Crime Definition Expanded to Include Digital Assets

One of the most significant aspects of Bill C-29 is its broad definition of “financial crime.”

The bill defines financial crime as offences related to:

• Financial assets
• Digital assets
• Financial services
• Financial markets

The legislation specifically includes offences involving:

• Money laundering
• Trafficking or possession of proceeds of crime
• Conduct affecting the integrity of Canada’s financial system
• Offences under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA)

This explicit inclusion of digital assets reflects Canada’s growing focus on crypto-related AML risks and blockchain-enabled financial crime.

For crypto exchanges, virtual asset service providers (VASPs), fintechs, and digital payment companies, this development indicates increased scrutiny and investigative specialization in the coming years.

Mandate of Canada’s Financial Crimes Agency

The proposed agency’s mandate is straightforward but expansive.

Under Section 7, the agency is tasked with:

• Investigating financial crimes
• Supporting recovery of proceeds of crime

The agency would also have authority to investigate:

• Any financial crime
• Any federal offence connected to financial crime

This creates broad investigative flexibility and potentially allows the agency to support investigations involving fraud, sanctions evasion, corruption, cyber-enabled financial crime, securities violations, organized crime financing, and crypto laundering schemes.

Independent Investigative Powers

Bill C-29 grants the Commissioner significant investigative powers.

The Commissioner may initiate investigations:

• Independently
• In collaboration with domestic agencies
• In coordination with foreign authorities

The bill specifically allows cooperation with:

• Canadian law enforcement agencies
• Foreign law enforcement bodies
• Domestic public authorities
• International investigative entities

This provision is particularly important given the increasingly transnational nature of money laundering and sanctions evasion networks.

For AML teams, this suggests stronger international intelligence-sharing and multi-jurisdictional investigations.

Focus on Serious and Complex Financial Crime

The legislation emphasizes that the agency’s resources should focus on “serious and complex financial crimes.”

The Commissioner is empowered to establish criteria for determining which matters warrant investigation.

This indicates that the agency will likely prioritize:

• Large-scale laundering networks
• Professional money laundering organizations
• Cross-border illicit finance
• Sanctions evasion
• Crypto-enabled laundering
• Trade-based money laundering
• Sophisticated fraud schemes
• High-value proceeds-of-crime investigations

New Police and Enforcement Powers

The bill authorizes designated employees of the agency to act as:

• Investigation officers
• Police officers with peace officer powers across Canada

This is a major operational development because it gives the new agency direct enforcement authority rather than limiting it to intelligence analysis or coordination functions.

The legislation further allows collaboration with the RCMP through formal operational arrangements.

This could significantly strengthen Canada’s ability to investigate:

• Complex laundering networks
• International sanctions violations
• Organized financial crime
• Illicit crypto transactions
• Cross-border asset recovery

Stronger Proceeds-of-Crime Recovery Framework

Bill C-29 places heavy emphasis on recovering proceeds of crime.

The legislation repeatedly references:

• Recovery of criminal proceeds
• Asset tracing
• Financial investigations
• Enforcement collaboration

This aligns with global AML enforcement trends where authorities are increasingly prioritizing:

• Asset confiscation
• Beneficial ownership transparency
• Financial disruption strategies
• Illicit wealth recovery

For reporting entities, this means transaction monitoring systems and investigations programs must become more effective at identifying:

• Layering activity
• Asset concealment
• Beneficial ownership risks
• Crypto laundering typologies
• Cross-border fund movements

Greater International Cooperation

The bill clearly positions Canada’s future Financial Crimes Agency as an internationally connected enforcement body.

The agency’s objectives include participation in international anti-financial crime efforts.

The legislation also permits:

• Information-sharing agreements
• International collaboration arrangements
• Joint investigations

This could strengthen Canada’s coordination with:

• FATF member jurisdictions
• Egmont Group FIUs
• Interpol
• International sanctions authorities
• Foreign financial intelligence agencies

Implications for AML Compliance Leaders

1. Increased Enforcement Risk

Canadian financial institutions and reporting entities should expect:

• More specialized investigations
• Faster coordination between agencies
• Increased scrutiny of high-risk sectors
• More sophisticated enforcement actions

2. Greater Focus on Digital Assets

The explicit inclusion of digital assets means crypto businesses operating in Canada should prepare for:

• Enhanced AML examinations
• Increased transaction scrutiny
• More detailed blockchain investigations
• Expanded beneficial ownership reviews

3. Higher Expectations for Transaction Monitoring

The agency’s focus on serious and complex financial crime suggests regulators and investigators will increasingly expect:

• Advanced AML analytics
• Behaviour-based monitoring
• Network analysis
• Adverse media intelligence
• Real-time sanctions screening

4. Stronger Cross-Border Information Sharing

Firms operating internationally may face:

• Multi-jurisdictional investigations
• Expanded requests for information
• Greater expectations around sanctions compliance
• Enhanced scrutiny of correspondent banking relationships

Consequential Amendments Signal Broader Reform

Bill C-29 also introduces consequential amendments to multiple Canadian laws and regulations, including:

• Criminal Code
• Privacy Act
• Access to Information Act
• Special Economic Measures Act
• Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
• Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Magnitsky Law)

This indicates that the government views financial crime enforcement as a whole-of-government national security and economic integrity issue.

What Financial Institutions Should Do Now

AML compliance teams in Canada should begin preparing for the implications of Bill C-29 by:

Strengthening AML Programs

• Reassess enterprise-wide AML risk assessments
• Enhance transaction monitoring capabilities
• Improve SAR/STR quality and escalation processes

Enhancing Digital Asset Controls

• Review crypto exposure
• Strengthen blockchain analytics
• Improve wallet screening and sanctions controls

Improving Beneficial Ownership Intelligence

• Enhance customer due diligence (CDD)
• Strengthen enhanced due diligence (EDD)
• Improve ultimate beneficial ownership verification

Preparing for Increased Investigations

• Improve case management systems
• Maintain stronger audit trails
• Ensure rapid response capabilities for regulator and law enforcement requests

Final Thoughts

Bill C-29 represents a major evolution in Canada’s AML and financial crime enforcement framework. By establishing a dedicated Financial Crimes Agency with investigative, policing, and proceeds-of-crime recovery powers, Canada is moving toward a more centralized and aggressive financial crime enforcement model.

For AML professionals, compliance officers, fintechs, banks, and crypto firms, the legislation signals that Canada is preparing for a future where financial crime investigations become:

• More specialized
• More technology-driven
• More international
• More enforcement-focused

Organizations that strengthen AML controls, digital asset monitoring, sanctions screening, and investigative readiness early will be better positioned for the next phase of Canada’s AML regulatory environment.

Canada’s Bill C-29: What the New Financial Crimes Agency Means for AML Compliance in 2026

Canada has introduced a major legislative reform that could significantly reshape the country’s anti-money laundering (AML), financial crime investigation, and proceeds-of-crime recovery framework. Bill C-29, officially titled the Financial Crimes Agency Act, proposes the creation of a dedicated federal Financial Crimes Agency (FCA) focused exclusively on investigating serious and complex financial crimes.

For AML compliance leaders, banks, fintechs, payment firms, crypto businesses, insurers, securities dealers, and reporting entities operating in Canada, this bill signals a strategic shift toward stronger enforcement, centralized investigations, and enhanced coordination against financial crime.

The legislation also expands Canada’s focus on digital assets, transnational financial crime, proceeds-of-crime recovery, and inter-agency cooperation — areas that are becoming increasingly critical in global AML compliance.

What Is Bill C-29?

Bill C-29 is a proposed Canadian federal law introduced in the House of Commons on April 27, 2026, to establish the Financial Crimes Agency as a specialized law enforcement body dedicated to combating financial crimes and recovering criminal proceeds.

The bill states that the new agency’s objective is to:

• Investigate serious and complex financial crimes
• Contribute to the recovery of proceeds of crime
• Participate in international efforts against financial crime

This marks one of the most important structural AML reforms in Canada in recent years.

Why Canada Is Creating a Financial Crimes Agency

Canada has faced increasing scrutiny over the effectiveness of its financial crime enforcement ecosystem. While FINTRAC operates as Canada’s financial intelligence unit (FIU), enforcement responsibilities have historically been fragmented across multiple agencies, including:

• Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)
• Provincial law enforcement agencies
• Canada Border Services Agency
• FINTRAC
• Public Prosecution Service of Canada

Bill C-29 aims to create a centralized federal agency with specialized expertise to investigate large-scale and sophisticated financial crimes.

The legislation explicitly recognizes the growing threat posed by:

• Money laundering
• Proceeds-of-crime networks
• Cross-border financial crime
• Financial market abuse
• Digital asset-related crimes
• Threats to Canada’s financial system integrity

Financial Crime Definition Expanded to Include Digital Assets

One of the most significant aspects of Bill C-29 is its broad definition of “financial crime.”

The bill defines financial crime as offences related to:

• Financial assets
• Digital assets
• Financial services
• Financial markets

The legislation specifically includes offences involving:

• Money laundering
• Trafficking or possession of proceeds of crime
• Conduct affecting the integrity of Canada’s financial system
• Offences under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA)

This explicit inclusion of digital assets reflects Canada’s growing focus on crypto-related AML risks and blockchain-enabled financial crime.

For crypto exchanges, virtual asset service providers (VASPs), fintechs, and digital payment companies, this development indicates increased scrutiny and investigative specialization in the coming years.

Mandate of Canada’s Financial Crimes Agency

The proposed agency’s mandate is straightforward but expansive.

Under Section 7, the agency is tasked with:

• Investigating financial crimes
• Supporting recovery of proceeds of crime

The agency would also have authority to investigate:

• Any financial crime
• Any federal offence connected to financial crime

This creates broad investigative flexibility and potentially allows the agency to support investigations involving fraud, sanctions evasion, corruption, cyber-enabled financial crime, securities violations, organized crime financing, and crypto laundering schemes.

Independent Investigative Powers

Bill C-29 grants the Commissioner significant investigative powers.

The Commissioner may initiate investigations:

• Independently
• In collaboration with domestic agencies
• In coordination with foreign authorities

The bill specifically allows cooperation with:

• Canadian law enforcement agencies
• Foreign law enforcement bodies
• Domestic public authorities
• International investigative entities

This provision is particularly important given the increasingly transnational nature of money laundering and sanctions evasion networks.

For AML teams, this suggests stronger international intelligence-sharing and multi-jurisdictional investigations.

Focus on Serious and Complex Financial Crime

The legislation emphasizes that the agency’s resources should focus on “serious and complex financial crimes.”

The Commissioner is empowered to establish criteria for determining which matters warrant investigation.

This indicates that the agency will likely prioritize:

• Large-scale laundering networks
• Professional money laundering organizations
• Cross-border illicit finance
• Sanctions evasion
• Crypto-enabled laundering
• Trade-based money laundering
• Sophisticated fraud schemes
• High-value proceeds-of-crime investigations

New Police and Enforcement Powers

The bill authorizes designated employees of the agency to act as:

• Investigation officers
• Police officers with peace officer powers across Canada

This is a major operational development because it gives the new agency direct enforcement authority rather than limiting it to intelligence analysis or coordination functions.

The legislation further allows collaboration with the RCMP through formal operational arrangements.

This could significantly strengthen Canada’s ability to investigate:

• Complex laundering networks
• International sanctions violations
• Organized financial crime
• Illicit crypto transactions
• Cross-border asset recovery

Stronger Proceeds-of-Crime Recovery Framework

Bill C-29 places heavy emphasis on recovering proceeds of crime.

The legislation repeatedly references:

• Recovery of criminal proceeds
• Asset tracing
• Financial investigations
• Enforcement collaboration

This aligns with global AML enforcement trends where authorities are increasingly prioritizing:

• Asset confiscation
• Beneficial ownership transparency
• Financial disruption strategies
• Illicit wealth recovery

For reporting entities, this means transaction monitoring systems and investigations programs must become more effective at identifying:

• Layering activity
• Asset concealment
• Beneficial ownership risks
• Crypto laundering typologies
• Cross-border fund movements

Greater International Cooperation

The bill clearly positions Canada’s future Financial Crimes Agency as an internationally connected enforcement body.

The agency’s objectives include participation in international anti-financial crime efforts.

The legislation also permits:

• Information-sharing agreements
• International collaboration arrangements
• Joint investigations

This could strengthen Canada’s coordination with:

• FATF member jurisdictions
• Egmont Group FIUs
• Interpol
• International sanctions authorities
• Foreign financial intelligence agencies

Implications for AML Compliance Leaders

1. Increased Enforcement Risk

Canadian financial institutions and reporting entities should expect:

• More specialized investigations
• Faster coordination between agencies
• Increased scrutiny of high-risk sectors
• More sophisticated enforcement actions

2. Greater Focus on Digital Assets

The explicit inclusion of digital assets means crypto businesses operating in Canada should prepare for:

• Enhanced AML examinations
• Increased transaction scrutiny
• More detailed blockchain investigations
• Expanded beneficial ownership reviews

3. Higher Expectations for Transaction Monitoring

The agency’s focus on serious and complex financial crime suggests regulators and investigators will increasingly expect:

• Advanced AML analytics
• Behaviour-based monitoring
• Network analysis
• Adverse media intelligence
• Real-time sanctions screening

4. Stronger Cross-Border Information Sharing

Firms operating internationally may face:

• Multi-jurisdictional investigations
• Expanded requests for information
• Greater expectations around sanctions compliance
• Enhanced scrutiny of correspondent banking relationships

Consequential Amendments Signal Broader Reform

Bill C-29 also introduces consequential amendments to multiple Canadian laws and regulations, including:

• Criminal Code
• Privacy Act
• Access to Information Act
• Special Economic Measures Act
• Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
• Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act (Magnitsky Law)

This indicates that the government views financial crime enforcement as a whole-of-government national security and economic integrity issue.

What Financial Institutions Should Do Now

AML compliance teams in Canada should begin preparing for the implications of Bill C-29 by:

Strengthening AML Programs

• Reassess enterprise-wide AML risk assessments
• Enhance transaction monitoring capabilities
• Improve SAR/STR quality and escalation processes

Enhancing Digital Asset Controls

• Review crypto exposure
• Strengthen blockchain analytics
• Improve wallet screening and sanctions controls

Improving Beneficial Ownership Intelligence

• Enhance customer due diligence (CDD)
• Strengthen enhanced due diligence (EDD)
• Improve ultimate beneficial ownership verification

Preparing for Increased Investigations

• Improve case management systems
• Maintain stronger audit trails
• Ensure rapid response capabilities for regulator and law enforcement requests

Final Thoughts

Bill C-29 represents a major evolution in Canada’s AML and financial crime enforcement framework. By establishing a dedicated Financial Crimes Agency with investigative, policing, and proceeds-of-crime recovery powers, Canada is moving toward a more centralized and aggressive financial crime enforcement model.

For AML professionals, compliance officers, fintechs, banks, and crypto firms, the legislation signals that Canada is preparing for a future where financial crime investigations become:

• More specialized
• More technology-driven
• More international
• More enforcement-focused

Organizations that strengthen AML controls, digital asset monitoring, sanctions screening, and investigative readiness early will be better positioned for the next phase of Canada’s AML regulatory environment.

Read about the laws click here.

Read about the product: Transact Comply

Empower your organization with ZIGRAM’s integrated RegTech solutions – Book a Demo