Anti Money Laundering News 18 May 2026

Anti Money Laundering News 18 May 2026

Anti Money Laundering News (04 May – 11 May 2026)

Welcome to this week’s edition of the Global AML News Weekly Digest. Here are the top stories making headlines around the world

Saudi Arabia to Fine Companies SAR 500,000 for Failure to Submit Financial Statements

Saudi Arabia has announced strict penalties for companies that fail to submit mandatory financial statements, with fines reaching up to SAR 500,000 (approximately ₹1.1 crore). The move forms part of the Kingdom’s broader effort to strengthen corporate governance, financial transparency, and regulatory compliance across the private sector. 

Under the updated enforcement approach, companies that do not comply with financial disclosure requirements within the prescribed timelines may face escalating penalties and regulatory action. Authorities are particularly targeting businesses that fail to provide audited accounts or intentionally delay disclosures that are essential for regulatory monitoring and investor protection.

The policy aims to improve the integrity of Saudi Arabia’s corporate ecosystem amid the country’s Vision 2030 reforms, which seek to attract foreign investment and modernize governance standards. Regulators are increasingly emphasizing accountability, accurate bookkeeping, and transparent reporting standards to combat financial manipulation, tax evasion, and potential money laundering risks.

The announcement also signals tighter oversight over commercial entities operating in Saudi Arabia, especially firms with large financial transactions or cross-border business exposure. Compliance experts note that stronger financial reporting obligations help authorities detect suspicious financial activity, identify shell companies, and improve AML/CFT enforcement mechanisms.

The development is expected to impact thousands of companies operating in the Kingdom, including SMEs and foreign-owned entities, many of which will need to strengthen internal accounting controls, audit preparedness, and regulatory reporting processes to avoid substantial penalties. 

Read More

SEBI Fines Former Religare Chairperson Rashmi Saluja ₹40 Lakh in Insider Trading Case

India’s Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has imposed a ₹40 lakh penalty on former Religare Enterprises Ltd. (REL) Chairperson Rashmi Saluja for insider trading violations and ordered disgorgement of approximately ₹2 crore in alleged unlawful gains.

The case relates to Saluja’s sale of Religare shares while allegedly in possession of unpublished price-sensitive information (UPSI) linked to the Burman Group’s proposed open offer for Religare Enterprises. According to SEBI, Saluja executed the trades before the public announcement of the open offer, thereby violating insider trading regulations under India’s Prohibition of Insider Trading (PIT) framework.

SEBI’s investigation found that Saluja had generally remained inactive in trading REL shares but sold shares shortly before the open offer disclosure. The regulator concluded that the timing and nature of the trades suggested access to confidential information unavailable to ordinary investors.

The regulator rejected Saluja’s defense that the sale proceeds were intended to exercise vested employee stock options (ESOPs) in Care Health Insurance. SEBI determined that the explanation did not sufficiently justify the timing of the transactions.

In addition to the ₹40 lakh monetary penalty, SEBI directed Saluja to disgorge ₹1.99 crore along with applicable interest, representing gains allegedly earned through the insider trades. The order marks another major enforcement action by SEBI amid heightened scrutiny of insider trading and corporate governance failures in India’s capital markets.

The case also underscores the regulator’s focus on monitoring board-level access to sensitive corporate information and enforcing stricter accountability among senior executives and promoters. The enforcement action could further intensify governance concerns surrounding Religare Enterprises and related takeover disputes involving the Burman family. 

Read More

Bhadohi Toll Plaza Firm Faces ₹62.87 Crore Stamp Duty Evasion Case

Authorities in Uttar Pradesh have intensified action against alleged large-scale stamp duty evasion linked to the Lalangar Toll Plaza project in Bhadohi district, with penalties and recovery proceedings amounting to approximately ₹62.87 crore. 

The case involves Kashi Toll Way Private Limited, which secured a 15-year toll collection contract from the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) for a stretch of National Highway-19 between Prayagraj and Varanasi. The contract value reportedly stood at around ₹3,144 crore.

Investigators alleged that instead of paying the mandatory 2% stamp duty applicable to lease agreements of this size, the company executed the agreement using a stamp paper worth only ₹100. Following scrutiny by district authorities, officials concluded that the arrangement constituted a major case of stamp duty evasion.

The Bhadohi district administration initiated proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh Stamp Act after multiple notices reportedly failed to elicit satisfactory responses from the company. The district magistrate’s court subsequently imposed recovery liabilities running into tens of crores of rupees.

The investigation gained momentum after a Supreme Court ruling in July 2024 clarified that toll concession agreements qualify as lease arrangements and are therefore subject to substantial stamp duty obligations. Following the ruling, Uttar Pradesh authorities reportedly began reviewing numerous toll agreements across the state for similar irregularities.

Officials indicated that more than 30 comparable cases may currently be under examination, suggesting wider concerns regarding infrastructure contract structuring and revenue leakage in public-private partnership projects.

The matter highlights growing enforcement around tax compliance, infrastructure financing transparency, and regulatory oversight of high-value concession agreements. It also raises concerns over possible systemic weaknesses in contract registration and compliance monitoring involving major infrastructure operators. 

Read More

UK FCA Bans and Fines Pension Advisory Director Frank Breuer for Misconduct

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has permanently banned pensions adviser Frank Breuer from working in financial services and imposed a fine of £755,000 for serious misconduct tied to pension transfer advice and governance failures.

Breuer was the joint owner and sole director of Birmingham-based Bluesky Wealth Management. According to the FCA, he repeatedly acted without integrity and placed customers at risk for personal financial gain.

The regulator found that Breuer continued providing pension transfer and investment advice without maintaining appropriate professional indemnity insurance from April 2019 onward. The absence of adequate insurance potentially exposed customers to uncompensated financial harm in the event of unsuitable advice or misconduct claims.

The FCA also concluded that Breuer endangered consumer protection safeguards and undermined confidence in the UK financial advisory sector. Bluesky Wealth Management later became insolvent in 2023 and entered liquidation.

The enforcement action forms part of the FCA’s broader crackdown on misconduct in pension transfer advice, an area that has faced heightened scrutiny due to risks involving unsuitable recommendations, retirement savings losses, and conflicts of interest.

Regulators increasingly view governance failures, insurance deficiencies, and integrity breaches as significant risks to market stability and consumer trust. The FCA stated that individuals holding senior management responsibilities must meet high standards of honesty, competence, and accountability.

The case further demonstrates the UK regulator’s willingness to impose both financial penalties and industry bans where misconduct threatens investor protection and financial system integrity.

Read More

New Zealand Passes Major AML Reforms to Reduce Compliance Burden

New Zealand has passed two major Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) reform bills aimed at reducing compliance burdens while strengthening the effectiveness of the country’s AML framework.

Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced the successful passage of the legislation, describing the reforms as a significant effort to “cut red tape” and improve regulatory efficiency for thousands of reporting entities operating under New Zealand’s AML/CFT regime.

One of the central reforms involves restructuring supervisory oversight by designating the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) as the sole AML/CFT supervisor. The changes grant the DIA expanded authority to issue rules, notices, codes of practice, and exemptions, reducing reliance on slower regulatory amendment processes.

The reforms are intended to simplify compliance requirements for businesses while enabling regulators to adopt a more risk-based and flexible supervisory model. Authorities stated that the legislation seeks to ensure that AML obligations remain proportionate and focused on higher-risk activities rather than creating unnecessary administrative burdens.

The measures are aligned with New Zealand’s broader AML/CFT National Strategy 2026–2030, which aims to strengthen law enforcement capabilities, improve financial intelligence processes, and protect the country from organized crime, fraud, and illicit financial flows.

Key changes expected to come into effect from July 1, 2026, include streamlined compliance processes, modernized supervisory powers, and enhanced mechanisms for issuing industry guidance and exemptions.

The reforms are particularly significant for financial institutions, casinos, lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, and other designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs), which have faced increasing compliance costs in recent years.

While the government emphasized reduced bureaucracy, officials maintained that the reforms would preserve strong safeguards against money laundering, terrorism financing, and organized criminal activity. Compliance professionals expect the changes to reshape how AML obligations are implemented and supervised across New Zealand’s regulated sectors. 

Read More

BofA Securities India Pays ₹58.5 Lakh to Settle SEBI Insider Trading Compliance Case

BofA Securities India has settled proceedings with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) by paying ₹58.5 lakh in a case involving alleged violations of insider trading and merchant banking regulations. 

The case centered on allegations that the Bank of America unit failed to maintain a Structured Digital Database (SDD), a mandatory compliance mechanism under India’s insider trading regulations designed to track individuals with access to unpublished price-sensitive information (UPSI).

SEBI reportedly initiated proceedings after identifying lapses linked to a March 2024 share sale involving Aditya Birla Sun Life Asset Management. According to the regulator, deal team members allegedly contacted potential investors while possessing confidential information, raising concerns regarding breaches of “Chinese wall” controls designed to separate sensitive information within financial institutions.

The regulator also alleged that the merchant banker failed to adequately preserve internal records and may have suppressed material facts or provided inaccurate statements during the investigation. The proceedings reportedly began following a whistleblower complaint.

BofA Securities India filed a settlement application in July 2025 without admitting or denying the findings. Following recommendations from SEBI’s advisory committee, the regulator approved the settlement in April 2026.

The settlement order allows the proceedings to conclude without a formal finding of guilt but does not prevent future regulatory action if any false disclosures or misrepresentations are discovered.

The case highlights SEBI’s growing emphasis on insider trading surveillance, data governance, and information barrier controls within investment banks and merchant banking institutions. Regulators globally are increasingly scrutinizing how financial institutions manage sensitive deal-related information, maintain audit trails, and prevent information leakage during capital market transactions. 

Read More

Stay informed with our weekly digest, bringing you the most impactful news from around the globe. Thank you for reading!

Subscribe to our weekly Newsletter – Click Here
Empower your organization with ZIGRAM’s integrated RegTech solutions – Book a Demo